Diagnosis and classification of ileal pouch disorders: consensus guidelines from the International Ileal Pouch Consortium.

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is an option for most patients with ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis who require colectomy. Although the construction of an ileal pouch substantially improves patients' health-related quality of life, the surgery is, directly or indirectly, associated with various structural, inflammatory, and functional adverse sequelae. Furthermore, the surgical procedure does not completely abolish the risk for neoplasia. Patients with ileal pouches often present with extraintestinal, systemic inflammatory conditions. The International Ileal Pouch Consortium was established to create this consensus document on the diagnosis and classification of ileal pouch disorders using available evidence and the panellists' expertise. In a given individual, the condition of the pouch can change over time. Therefore, close monitoring of the activity and progression of the disease is essential to make accurate modifications in the diagnosis and classification in a timely manner.

Recomendaciones del Grupo Español de Trabajo en Enfermedad de Crohn y Colitis Ulcerosa (GETECCU) sobre la reservoritis en la colitis ulcerosa. Parte 1: epidemiología, diagnóstico y pronóstico / Recommendations of the Spanish Working Group on Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis (GETECCU) on pouchitis in ulcerative colitis. Part 1: Epidemiology, diagnosis and prognosis

La reservoritis es una complicación frecuente en los pacientes con colitis ulcerosa tratados mediante una proctocolectomía total. Consiste en una inflamación inespecífica del reservorio ileo-anal, cuya etiología no se conoce aún por completo. Esta inflamación induce la aparición de síntomas como urgencia, diarrea, rectorragia y dolor abdominal, alterando la calidad de vida de los pacientes que la padecen. Para su diagnóstico, además de los síntomas, es necesario realizar una endoscopia con toma de biopsias. El índice recomendado para valorar su actividad es el Pouchitis Disease Activity Index (PDAI), aunque puede emplearse su forma modificada (PDAIm). De acuerdo con la duración de los síntomas, la reservoritis se clasifica en aguda (< 4 semanas) o crónica (> 4 semanas). Según su curso evolutivo, se clasifica en infrecuente (< 4 episodios/año), recurrente (> 4 episodios/año) o de curso continuo

Pouchitis is a common complication in ulcerative colitis patients after total proctocolectomy. This is an unspecific inflammation of the ileo-anal pouch, the aetiology of which is not fully known. This inflammation induces the onset of symptoms such as urgency, diarrhoea, rectal bleeding and abdominal pain. Many patients suffering from pouchitis have a lower quality of life. In addition to symptoms, an endoscopy with biopsies is mandatory in order to establish a definite diagnosis. The recommended index to assess its activity is the Pouchitis Disease Activity Index (PDAI), but its modified version (PDAIm) can be used in clinical practice. In accordance with the duration of symptoms, pouchitis can be classified as acute (<4 weeks) or chronic (>4 weeks), and, regarding its course, pouchitis can be infrequent (<4 episodes per year), recurrent (>4 episodes per year) or continuous

Recommendations of the Spanish Working Group on Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis (GETECCU) on pouchitis in ulcerative colitis. Part 1: Epidemiology, diagnosis and prognosis. / Recomendaciones del Grupo Español de Trabajo en Enfermedad de Crohn y Colitis Ulcerosa (GETECCU) sobre la reservoritis en la colitis ulcerosa. Parte 1: epidemiología, diagnóstico y pronóstico.

Pouchitis is a common complication in ulcerative colitis patients after total proctocolectomy. This is an unspecific inflammation of the ileo-anal pouch, the aetiology of which is not fully known. This inflammation induces the onset of symptoms such as urgency, diarrhoea, rectal bleeding and abdominal pain. Many patients suffering from pouchitis have a lower quality of life. In addition to symptoms, an endoscopy with biopsies is mandatory in order to establish a definite diagnosis. The recommended index to assess its activity is the Pouchitis Disease Activity Index (PDAI), but its modified version (PDAIm) can be used in clinical practice. In accordance with the duration of symptoms, pouchitis can be classified as acute (<4 weeks) or chronic (>4 weeks), and, regarding its course, pouchitis can be infrequent (<4 episodes per year), recurrent (>4 episodes per year) or continuous.

Management of Pouchitis and Other Common Complications of the Pouch.

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) has become the preferred surgical treatment for refractory or complicated ulcerative colitis (UC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Pouchitis is the most common complication of this procedure and can occur in about 50% of patients. Treatment of pouchitis depends on the phenotype of disease. Pouchitis can be classified as acute, chronic/refractory, or secondary pouchitis, which includes pouchitis occurring due to Crohn's disease (CD). CD of the pouch is becoming an increasingly recognized problem, and management is challenging. This article reviews the literature and offers treatment recommendations regarding management of pouchitis and CD of the pouch.

Reservoritis/pouchitis: fisiopatología y manejo basado en la evidencia / Reservoirs/pouchitis: physiopathology and evidence-based management

Pouchitis is a frequent complication following proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, mainly in patients with ulcerative colitis. Though etiology is still unknown, evidence shows that there is a relation with host microbiota. Management of chronic refractory pouchitis is challenging, and current evidence showns that the use of biologic agents may have a favourable response.

La reservoritis es una complicación frecuente en pacientes en quienes se ha practicado una proctocolectomía con reservorio ileal, principalmente en pacientes con colitis ulcerosa. La etiología si bien es desconocida, la evidencia actual apunta a que exista una relación con la microbiota del huésped. La reservoritis refractaria crónica es un desafio en el manejo y actualmente ha surgido evidencia que apunta que el uso de biológicos puede tener una respuesta favorable.

Inflammatory pouch disease: The spectrum of pouchitis.

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal-pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the operation of choice for medically refractory ulcerative colitis (UC), for UC with dysplasia, and for familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). IPAA can be a treatment option for selected patients with Crohn's colitis without perianal and/or small bowel disease. The term "pouchitis" refers to nonspecific inflammation of the pouch and is a common complication in patients with IPAA; it occurs more often in UC patients than in FAP patients. This suggests that the pathogenetic background of UC may contribute significantly to the development of pouchitis. The symptoms of pouchitis are many, and can include increased bowel frequency, urgency, tenesmus, incontinence, nocturnal seepage, rectal bleeding, abdominal cramps, and pelvic discomfort. The diagnosis of pouchitis is based on the presence of symptoms together with endoscopic and histological evidence of inflammation of the pouch. However, "pouchitis" is a general term representing a wide spectrum of diseases and conditions, which can emerge in the pouch. Based on the etiology we can sub-divide pouchitis into 2 groups: idiopathic and secondary. In idiopathic pouchitis the etiology and pathogenesis are still unclear, while in secondary pouchitis there is an association with a specific causative or pathogenetic factor. Secondary pouchitis can occur in up to 30% of cases and can be classified as infectious, ischemic, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs-induced, collagenous, autoimmune-associated, or Crohn's disease. Sometimes, cuffitis or irritable pouch syndrome can be misdiagnosed as pouchitis. Furthermore, idiopathic pouchitis itself can be sub-classified into types based on the clinical pattern, presentation, and responsiveness to antibiotic treatment. Treatment differs among the various forms of pouchitis. Therefore, it is important to establish the correct diagnosis in order to select the appropriate treatment and further management. In this editorial, we present the spectrum of pouchitis and the specific features related to the diagnosis and treatment of the various forms.

Managing intractable proctitis and the problematic pouch.

Proctitis accounts for a significant proportion of cases of ulcerative colitis (UC), and some patients subsequently develop more extensive disease. However, most patients continue to have limited inflammation, although the changes in the distal colon and rectum can occasionally be severe, and symptoms of increased frequency, rectal bleeding and urgency can be as disabling as they are for patients with more extensive colitis. Furthermore, although symptoms are typically well controlled with standard medications, medically refractory proctitis poses particular problems. Patients generally are not systemically unwell, and there is no added fear of cancer. Therefore, the prospect of colectomy for such limited disease is resisted by patients, physicians and surgeons alike. Unusual therapies, often delivered locally by enema or suppository, have been tested in small case series without definitive outcomes. The pathogenesis of such limited, yet intractable inflammation remains unclear, and the differential diagnosis should be carefully reviewed to ensure that local disease, whether it is infectious, vascular, or a result of injury or degeneration, is not overlooked. Ileo-anal pouch formation is the surgery of choice for about 20% of patients with UC who undergo colectomy. In the majority of cases, this surgery results in an acceptable quality of life and freedom from a stoma. However, in a sizeable minority of cases, pouch dysfunction can cause intractable problems. The causes of pouch dysfunction are varied and must all be considered carefully, particularly in refractory cases. Pouchitis is a common issue and is usually transient and easily treated. However, refractory and chronic pouchitis can be challenging. Ischaemia, injury, infection and Crohn's disease can all cause refractory pouch dysfunction. In a minority of cases, there appears to be no apparent organic pathology, and the presumptive diagnosis is that of a functional pouch disorder. Although it is much rarer, neoplastic changes in the pouch must also be considered, and the risk managed appropriately. The management of both intractable proctitis and the problematic pouch is made more challenging by the wide differential diagnosis that must be considered and by the paucity of high-quality clinical trials to support any one therapy. Key strategies to overcoming these limitations include methodical and systematic investigation and review, and a willingness to tailor therapy to the individual patient. Clinical trials of new treatments should be supported, and data from the experience with small cohorts of patients should be meticulously collected, critically analysed and widely disseminated.

Risk factors for diseases of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Although pouchitis is considered the most common adverse sequela of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA), inflammatory and noninflammatory conditions other than pouchitis are increasingly being recognized. The risk factors for these non-pouchitis conditions, including Crohn's disease (CD) of the pouch, cuffitis, and irritable pouch syndrome (IPS), have not been studied. The aim of this study was to assess risk factors for inflammatory and noninflammatory diseases of IPAA in a tertiary care setting. METHODS: The study consisted of 240 consecutive patients who were classified as having healthy pouches (N = 49), pouchitis (N = 61), CD of the pouch (N = 39), cuffitis (N = 41), or IPS (N =50). Demographic and clinical features were assessed to determine risk factors for each of these conditions by using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Risk factors remaining in the final logistic regression models were for pouchitis: IPAA indication for dysplasia (odds ratio [OR], 3.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.69-8.98), never having smoked (OR, 5.09; 95% CI, 1.01-25.69), no use of anti-anxiety agents (OR, 5.19; 95% CI, 1.45-18.59), or use of NSAIDs (OR, 3.24; 95% CI, 1.71-6.13); for CD of the pouch: a long duration of IPAA (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.12-1.30) and current smoking (OR, 4.77; 95% CI, 1.39-16.25); for cuffitis: arthralgias (OR, 4.13; 95% CI, 1.91-8.94) and younger age (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01-1.33); and for IPS: use of antidepressants (OR, 4.17, 95% CI, 1.95-8.92) or anti-anxiety agents (OR, 3.21; 95% CI, 1.34-7.47). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of risk factors for the 4 inflammatory and noninflammatory conditions of IPAA are different, suggesting that each of these diseases has a different etiology and pathogenesis. The identification and modification of these risk factors might help patients and clinicians to make a preoperative decision for IPAA, reduce IPAA-related morbidity, and improve response to treatment.

[Diagnosis and medical treatment of pouchitis in ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis].

Pouchitis is a common and long-term complication of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with underlying ulcerative colitis. Combination with clinical symptoms, endoscopic and histopathological findings are required to make accurate diagnosis. Ciprofloxacin and metronidazole are effective in patients with acute pouchitis. Probiotics may be useful in maintaining regression and preventing from remission. Immunomodulating agents are also useful in chronic pouchitis.

Diagnosis and treatment of patients with pouchitis.

Pouchitis is the most common long-term complication of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with underlying ulcerative colitis. Clinical symptoms of pouchitis are not specific, and they can be caused by other conditions such as rectal cuff inflammation and irritable pouch syndrome. Therefore, to make an accurate diagnosis, endoscopic evaluation together with symptom assessment is necessary. Among five available treat-first and test-first strategies, the initial approach with pouch endoscopy without histology was the most cost-effective strategy for the diagnosis of pouchitis. On the basis of clinical course, pouchitis can be classified into acute, relapsing and chronic forms. Pouchitis can also be classified into three categories based on the response to antibacterial therapy: antibacterial-responsive; antibacterial-dependent; and antibacterial-resistant. Metronidazole and ciprofloxacin are both effective in treating acute pouchitis. Although antibacterial therapy can induce and maintain remission, probiotics such as VSL#3 can also be used as to maintain clinical remission and prevent relapse in patients with relapsing or chronic pouchitis. For patients with chronic pouchitis that is resistant to antibacterials, therapy with anti-inflammatory agents and immunomodulators is often required.

Diagnosing pouchitis: comparative validation of two scoring systems in routine follow-up.

PURPOSE: Pouchitis represents a serious threat to patients with ulcerative colitis after restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. The frequency of pouchitis is high, and it implies the risk of pouch failure and the risk of malignant mucosal transformation in the pouch. Early detection and precise classification of the inflammatory process are required for adequate therapy, which might be facilitated using a scoring system. The aim of the present study was to validate two existing scoring systems in routine outpatient practice. METHOD: The Heidelberg Pouchitis Activity Score and the Pouchitis Disease Activity Index developed at the Mayo Clinic were simultaneously prospectively applied in a consecutive series of 103 outpatient consultations of 41 patients at our hospital and comparatively validated against the diagnosis of " pouchitis" or "no pouchitis" concurrently made by a physician and a surgeon. RESULTS: The median score of examinations in which the clinicians' diagnosis was consistent with pouchitis were significantly higher than those of examinations inconsistent with pouchitis in both scoring systems (Heidelberg Pouchitis Activity Score, 17 (interquartile range, 14-21) and 8 (interquartile range, 5-10), respectively, P < 0.001; Pouchitis Disease Activity Index, 7 (interquartile range, 5-8) and 2.5 (interquartile range, 1-4), respectively, P < 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity in the two total scores were 84 and 79.5 percent, respectively (Heidelberg Pouchitis Activity Score), and 60 and 96.2 percent, respectively (Pouchitis Disease Activity Index); in the field clinical manifestations 44 and 73.1 percent, respectively (Heidelberg Pouchitis Activity Score), and 20 and 87.2 percent, respectively (Pouchitis Disease Activity Index); in the field endoscopic manifestations 88 and 83.3 percent, respectively (Heidelberg Pouchitis Activity Score), and 60 and 89.7 percent, respectively (Pouchitis Disease Activity Index); and in the field histologic manifestations 72 and 76.9 percent, respectively (Heidelberg Pouchitis Activity Score), and 44 and 96.2 percent, respectively (Pouchitis Disease Activity Index). Lowering the cutoff point for diagnosis of pouchitis in the Pouchitis Disease Activity Index by 2 points (pouchitis: score >or= 5) would result in an 88 percent sensitivity and a 67 percent specificity. CONCLUSIONS: Specificity and sensitivity of the Heidelberg Pouchitis Activity Score were satisfactory. The cutoff point for diagnosing pouchitis in the Pouchitis Disease Activity Index would have to be lowered to reach an acceptable sensitivity and specificity. The very poor validity of the field clinical manifestations in diagnosing pouchitis emphasizes the need for endoscopic and histologic examination for detection of pouchitis. The issue of whether the diagnosis of pouchitis should be based on endoscopic and histologic features alone, instead of additionally taking clinical features into account, should be addressed in future studies.

Four-week open-label trial of metronidazole and ciprofloxacin for the treatment of recurrent or refractory pouchitis.

BACKGROUND: Preliminary data suggest that short-term antibiotic therapy with a single drug is effective for the treatment of patients with pouchitis. However, some patients are resistant to treatment. AIM: To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of a prolonged course of a combination of two antibiotics in patients with refractory or recurrent pouchitis, as well as its impact on their quality of life. METHODS: Patients with active refractory or recurrent pouchitis were recruited. This was defined as both: (i) a history of pouchitis at least twice in the last 12 months or persistent pouchitis requiring continual intake of antibiotics; and (ii) a Pouchitis Disease Activity Index score 3 7 (best to worst pouchitis=0-18) at the beginning of therapy. Treatment consisted of a combination of metronidazole, 400 or 500 mg twice daily, and ciprofloxacin, 500 mg twice daily, for 28 days. Symptomatic, endoscopic and histological evaluations were undertaken before and after antibiotic therapy using the Pouchitis Disease Activity Index score. Remission was defined as a combination of a Pouchitis Disease Activity Index clinical score of

Long-term follow-up after ileoanal pouch procedure: algorithm for diagnosis, classification, and management of pouchitis.

PURPOSE: Inflammation of the ileoanal pouch (pouchitis) is one of the main complications after restorative proctocolectomy, yet its cause remains poorly understood. A standardized definition and diagnostic procedures in pouchitis are lacking. METHOD: We analyzed all cases of pouchitis occurring in a group of 308 patients (210 with ulcerative colitis, 98 with familial adenomatous polyposis) who took part in a prospective long-term follow-up program. The severity of pouchitis was measured using a pouchitis activity score (Heidelberg Pouchitis Activity Score). An algorithm for the classification and management of pouchitis was established which enables the clinician: 1) to determine the severity of pouchitis, 2) to differentiate between primary pouchitis and pouchitis caused by surgical complications (secondary pouchitis), and 3) to evaluate the course (acute vs. chronic (> 3 months)). RESULTS: The median duration of follow-up was 48 (range, 13-119) months. At least one episode of pouchitis was diagnosed in 29 percent of patients with ulcerative colitis and in 2 percent of familial adenomatous polyposis patients. Secondary pouchitis occurred in 6 percent of ulcerative colitis patients and was cured by surgical treatment in 13 (87 percent) of 15 cases. Primary pouchitis was diagnosed in 23 percent of ulcerative colitis patients, including 6 percent of all ulcerative colitis patients with chronic primary pouchitis. The latter showed poor response to medical treatment. In one case multifocal high-grade dysplasia occurred. Histologic examination of the excised pouch identified a carcinoma originating from the ileal mucosa. CONCLUSIONS: Ulcerative colitis patients after restorative proctocolectomy face a high risk of developing pouchitis. The algorithm used in this study was highly efficient in identifying patients with a secondary pouchitis who require surgical treatment and patients with chronic primary pouchitis. For the latter, long-term surveillance seems mandatory because of the risk of malignant transformation of the pouch mucosa.